--- EXPERIMENT NOTES




 --- EXPERIMENT PROPERTIES

#Wed Apr 11 22:39:45 WEST 2018
codeml.models=1 2 7 8
mrbayes.mpich=
mrbayes.ngen=1000000
tcoffee.alignMethod=MUSCLE
tcoffee.params=
tcoffee.maxSeqs=0
codeml.bin=codeml
mrbayes.tburnin=2500
codeml.dir=
input.sequences=
mrbayes.pburnin=2500
mrbayes.bin=mb
tcoffee.bin=t_coffee
mrbayes.dir=
tcoffee.dir=
tcoffee.minScore=3
input.fasta=
input.names=
mrbayes.params=
codeml.params=



 --- PSRF SUMMARY

      Estimated marginal likelihoods for runs sampled in files
"/home/jorge/Data/ADOPS/HLA/HLA-DQA2/batch/allfiles/mrbayes/input.fasta.fasta.mrb.run1.p" and "/home/jorge/Data/ADOPS/HLA/HLA-DQA2/batch/allfiles/mrbayes/input.fasta.fasta.mrb.run2.p":
(Use the harmonic mean for Bayes factor comparisons of models)

Run   Arithmetic mean   Harmonic mean
--------------------------------------
1       -1621.96          -1635.10
2       -1622.04          -1635.29
--------------------------------------
TOTAL     -1622.00          -1635.20
--------------------------------------


Model parameter summaries over the runs sampled in files
"/home/jorge/Data/ADOPS/HLA/HLA-DQA2/batch/allfiles/mrbayes/input.fasta.fasta.mrb.run1.p" and "/home/jorge/Data/ADOPS/HLA/HLA-DQA2/batch/allfiles/mrbayes/input.fasta.fasta.mrb.run2.p":
(Summaries are based on a total of 15002 samples from 2 runs)
(Each run produced 10001 samples of which 7501 samples were included)

95% Cred. Interval
----------------------
Parameter          Mean        Variance       Lower         Upper         Median       PSRF *
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TL{all}           0.150195      0.000323      0.118000      0.189000      0.149000      1.000
r(A<->C){all}     0.093492      0.000961      0.042005      0.162026      0.090481      1.000
r(A<->G){all}     0.358685      0.003059      0.255512      0.469584      0.357358      1.003
r(A<->T){all}     0.052658      0.000659      0.013369      0.113591      0.049067      1.000
r(C<->G){all}     0.014515      0.000154      0.000459      0.045676      0.011230      1.001
r(C<->T){all}     0.407011      0.003196      0.300013      0.521326      0.405729      1.001
r(G<->T){all}     0.073640      0.000684      0.030800      0.131475      0.070858      1.003
pi(A){all}        0.216009      0.000208      0.188822      0.244559      0.215721      1.001
pi(C){all}        0.267102      0.000235      0.237644      0.297986      0.266735      1.000
pi(G){all}        0.253296      0.000227      0.224413      0.283605      0.252868      1.000
pi(T){all}        0.263593      0.000227      0.234750      0.293549      0.263328      1.000
alpha{1,2}       96.129957   3509.943855      2.413238    194.553511     94.952352      1.000
alpha{3}         99.566418   3270.631513      6.520508    194.775279     98.404751      1.000
pinvar{all}       0.621317      0.012019      0.347806      0.773164      0.642304      1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Convergence diagnostic (PSRF = Potential scale reduction factor [Gelman
and Rubin, 1992], uncorrected) should approach 1 as runs converge. The
values may be unreliable if you have a small number of samples. PSRF should
only be used as a rough guide to convergence since all the assumptions
that allow one to interpret it as a scale reduction factor are not met in
the phylogenetic context.



 --- CODEML SUMMARY

Model 8: beta&w>1	-1564.570029
Model 7: beta	-1564.570029
Model 1: NearlyNeutral	-1564.60341
Model 2: PositiveSelection	-1564.60341


Model 2 vs 1	0.0

Model 8 vs 7	0.0