--- EXPERIMENT NOTES




 --- EXPERIMENT PROPERTIES

#Fri Mar 23 17:31:00 WET 2018
codeml.models=0 1 2 3 7 8
mrbayes.mpich=
mrbayes.ngen=1000000
tcoffee.alignMethod=MUSCLE
tcoffee.params=
tcoffee.maxSeqs=0
codeml.bin=codeml
mrbayes.tburnin=2500
codeml.dir=
input.sequences=
mrbayes.pburnin=2500
mrbayes.bin=mb_adops
tcoffee.bin=t_coffee_ADOPS
mrbayes.dir=/usr/bin/
tcoffee.dir=
tcoffee.minScore=3
input.fasta=/opt/ADOPS1/HIV1_AMINO/POL_1_4/input.fasta
input.names=
mrbayes.params=
codeml.params=



 --- PSRF SUMMARY

      Estimated marginal likelihoods for runs sampled in files
"/opt/ADOPS1/HIV1_AMINO/POL_1_4/batch/allfiles/mrbayes/input.fasta.fasta.mrb.run1.p" and "/opt/ADOPS1/HIV1_AMINO/POL_1_4/batch/allfiles/mrbayes/input.fasta.fasta.mrb.run2.p":
(Use the harmonic mean for Bayes factor comparisons of models)

(Values are saved to the file /opt/ADOPS1/HIV1_AMINO/POL_1_4/batch/allfiles/mrbayes/input.fasta.fasta.mrb.lstat)

Run   Arithmetic mean   Harmonic mean
--------------------------------------
1     -32019.53        -32063.92
2     -32023.26        -32067.52
--------------------------------------
TOTAL   -32020.20        -32066.85
--------------------------------------


Model parameter summaries over the runs sampled in files
"/opt/ADOPS1/HIV1_AMINO/POL_1_4/batch/allfiles/mrbayes/input.fasta.fasta.mrb.run1.p" and "/opt/ADOPS1/HIV1_AMINO/POL_1_4/batch/allfiles/mrbayes/input.fasta.fasta.mrb.run2.p":
Summaries are based on a total of 3002 samples from 2 runs.
Each run produced 2001 samples of which 1501 samples were included.
Parameter summaries saved to file "/opt/ADOPS1/HIV1_AMINO/POL_1_4/batch/allfiles/mrbayes/input.fasta.fasta.mrb.pstat".

95% HPD Interval
--------------------
Parameter         Mean      Variance     Lower       Upper       Median    min ESS*  avg ESS    PSRF+
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TL{all}         4.441065    0.023222    4.150289    4.732285    4.441427    477.91    565.90    1.000
r(A<->C){all}   0.082099    0.000016    0.074269    0.089541    0.081973    635.31    652.45    1.000
r(A<->G){all}   0.343648    0.000159    0.316881    0.366342    0.343305    258.72    295.90    1.001
r(A<->T){all}   0.035443    0.000006    0.030560    0.040157    0.035412    664.52    758.42    1.000
r(C<->G){all}   0.040414    0.000016    0.032540    0.048144    0.040304    703.56    725.35    1.002
r(C<->T){all}   0.455836    0.000183    0.429183    0.482523    0.456097    245.32    303.50    1.000
r(G<->T){all}   0.042559    0.000013    0.035681    0.049546    0.042434    654.76    739.14    1.000
pi(A){all}      0.413391    0.000048    0.400124    0.427163    0.413283    380.19    505.75    1.000
pi(C){all}      0.169779    0.000026    0.159917    0.179514    0.169876    413.74    434.70    1.001
pi(G){all}      0.208506    0.000030    0.197701    0.219167    0.208434    407.40    507.69    1.000
pi(T){all}      0.208325    0.000034    0.196599    0.219976    0.208098    477.72    527.70    1.000
alpha{1,2}      0.271833    0.000190    0.244307    0.298083    0.271162    902.63   1037.12    1.000
alpha{3}        1.846141    0.028457    1.549817    2.206889    1.835793   1035.94   1073.92    1.000
pinvar{all}     0.233658    0.000299    0.200053    0.265875    0.233762    690.49    780.28    1.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Convergence diagnostic (ESS = Estimated Sample Size); min and avg values
correspond to minimal and average ESS among runs.
ESS value below 100 may indicate that the parameter is undersampled.
+ Convergence diagnostic (PSRF = Potential Scale Reduction Factor; Gelman
and Rubin, 1992) should approach 1.0 as runs converge.


Setting sumt conformat to Simple



 --- CODEML SUMMARY

Model 1: NearlyNeutral	-31440.889907
Model 2: PositiveSelection	-31361.228449
Model 0: one-ratio	-32961.858322
Model 3: discrete	-31127.923568
Model 7: beta	-31177.634244
Model 8: beta&w>1	-31070.761562


Model 0 vs 1	3041.9368299999987

Model 2 vs 1	159.32291600000462

Additional information for M1 vs M2:
Naive Empirical Bayes (NEB) analysis
Positively selected sites (*: P>95%; **: P>99%)
(amino acids refer to 1st sequence: C.ZM.05.ZM410F.KM050667_)

            Pr(w>1)     post mean +- SE for w

    21 T      0.646         2.277
    32 Q      0.878         2.736
    40 L      0.540         2.069
   105 P      1.000**       2.977
   264 N      1.000**       2.977
   352 K      0.962*        2.903
   386 V      1.000**       2.977
   427 A      0.965*        2.909
   475 H      0.540         2.069
   498 T      0.994**       2.965
   517 A      0.973*        2.924
   576 V      0.872         2.724
   593 I      0.843         2.667
   609 S      0.956*        2.891
   624 Q      0.984*        2.947
   695 S      1.000**       2.977
   773 I      0.556         2.099
   825 A      1.000**       2.977

Bayes Empirical Bayes (BEB) analysis (Yang, Wong & Nielsen 2005. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:1107-1118)
Positively selected sites (*: P>95%; **: P>99%)
(amino acids refer to 1st sequence: C.ZM.05.ZM410F.KM050667_)

            Pr(w>1)     post mean +- SE for w

    17 P      0.686         2.039 +- 0.710
    21 T      0.827         2.257 +- 0.588
    32 Q      0.934         2.424 +- 0.406
    35 S      0.506         1.763 +- 0.757
    40 L      0.790         2.197 +- 0.627
    41 N      0.643         1.968 +- 0.724
    52 L      0.510         1.773 +- 0.763
   105 P      1.000**       2.525 +- 0.155
   264 N      1.000**       2.525 +- 0.155
   348 E      0.568         1.855 +- 0.749
   352 K      0.984*        2.499 +- 0.245
   386 V      1.000**       2.525 +- 0.155
   427 A      0.978*        2.492 +- 0.269
   475 H      0.811         2.228 +- 0.602
   498 T      0.998**       2.521 +- 0.170
   517 A      0.983*        2.499 +- 0.249
   518 M      0.782         2.176 +- 0.623
   576 V      0.967*        2.469 +- 0.304
   593 I      0.938         2.427 +- 0.394
   609 S      0.971*        2.480 +- 0.299
   624 Q      0.992**       2.512 +- 0.208
   632 S      0.600         1.903 +- 0.739
   695 S      1.000**       2.525 +- 0.155
   773 I      0.810         2.228 +- 0.604
   775 I      0.533         1.808 +- 0.762
   802 I      0.723         2.096 +- 0.686
   820 T      0.551         1.829 +- 0.750
   825 A      1.000**       2.524 +- 0.157


Model 8 vs 7	213.74536400000216

Additional information for M7 vs M8:
Naive Empirical Bayes (NEB) analysis
Positively selected sites (*: P>95%; **: P>99%)
(amino acids refer to 1st sequence: C.ZM.05.ZM410F.KM050667_)

            Pr(w>1)     post mean +- SE for w

    17 P      0.941         2.036
    21 T      0.980*        2.094
    27 T      0.787         1.809
    32 Q      0.993**       2.113
    35 S      0.877         1.942
    40 L      0.977*        2.089
    41 N      0.963*        2.068
    42 C      0.597         1.528
    52 L      0.802         1.831
   105 P      1.000**       2.123
   264 N      1.000**       2.123
   303 S      0.569         1.492
   348 E      0.948         2.047
   352 K      0.999**       2.122
   386 V      1.000**       2.123
   418 R      0.820         1.859
   427 A      0.999**       2.121
   475 H      0.982*        2.096
   498 T      1.000**       2.123
   517 A      0.999**       2.121
   518 M      0.994**       2.115
   576 V      1.000**       2.122
   593 I      0.997**       2.118
   609 S      0.997**       2.119
   624 Q      1.000**       2.122
   632 S      0.954*        2.055
   695 S      1.000**       2.123
   773 I      0.985*        2.101
   775 I      0.806         1.837
   802 I      0.965*        2.071
   820 T      0.937         2.030
   825 A      1.000**       2.123

Bayes Empirical Bayes (BEB) analysis (Yang, Wong & Nielsen 2005. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:1107-1118)
Positively selected sites (*: P>95%; **: P>99%)
(amino acids refer to 1st sequence: C.ZM.05.ZM410F.KM050667_)

            Pr(w>1)     post mean +- SE for w

    17 P      0.830         2.224 +- 0.610
    21 T      0.926         2.382 +- 0.421
    27 T      0.600         1.842 +- 0.809
    32 Q      0.974*        2.459 +- 0.254
    35 S      0.669         1.962 +- 0.768
    40 L      0.885         2.315 +- 0.513
    41 N      0.726         2.061 +- 0.715
    52 L      0.664         1.946 +- 0.781
   105 P      1.000**       2.500 +- 0.001
   264 N      1.000**       2.500 +- 0.001
   348 E      0.659         1.954 +- 0.760
   352 K      0.993**       2.488 +- 0.135
   386 V      1.000**       2.500 +- 0.001
   427 A      0.994**       2.490 +- 0.124
   475 H      0.869         2.290 +- 0.540
   498 T      0.999**       2.498 +- 0.060
   517 A      0.995**       2.492 +- 0.111
   518 M      0.787         2.163 +- 0.647
   576 V      0.979*        2.467 +- 0.227
   593 I      0.969*        2.451 +- 0.275
   609 S      0.991**       2.486 +- 0.150
   624 Q      0.996**       2.494 +- 0.094
   632 S      0.685         1.995 +- 0.745
   695 S      1.000**       2.500 +- 0.001
   773 I      0.895         2.332 +- 0.490
   775 I      0.706         2.013 +- 0.758
   802 I      0.847         2.255 +- 0.579
   820 T      0.651         1.940 +- 0.767
   825 A      1.000**       2.500 +- 0.014