--- EXPERIMENT NOTES




 --- EXPERIMENT PROPERTIES

#Fri Nov 03 19:38:05 WET 2017
codeml.models=0 1 2 3 7 8
mrbayes.mpich=
mrbayes.ngen=1000000
tcoffee.alignMethod=MUSCLE
tcoffee.params=
tcoffee.maxSeqs=0
codeml.bin=codeml
mrbayes.tburnin=2500
codeml.dir=
input.sequences=
mrbayes.pburnin=2500
mrbayes.bin=mb_adops
tcoffee.bin=t_coffee_ADOPS
mrbayes.dir=/usr/bin/
tcoffee.dir=
tcoffee.minScore=3
input.fasta=
input.names=
mrbayes.params=
codeml.params=



 --- PSRF SUMMARY

      Estimated marginal likelihoods for runs sampled in files
"/opt/ADOPS1/revmuscle/S10/batch/allfiles/mrbayes/input.fasta.fasta.mrb.run1.p" and "/opt/ADOPS1/revmuscle/S10/batch/allfiles/mrbayes/input.fasta.fasta.mrb.run2.p":
(Use the harmonic mean for Bayes factor comparisons of models)

(Values are saved to the file /opt/ADOPS1/revmuscle/S10/batch/allfiles/mrbayes/input.fasta.fasta.mrb.lstat)

Run   Arithmetic mean   Harmonic mean
--------------------------------------
1      -8080.82         -8098.90
2      -8080.55         -8098.70
--------------------------------------
TOTAL    -8080.68         -8098.81
--------------------------------------


Model parameter summaries over the runs sampled in files
"/opt/ADOPS1/revmuscle/S10/batch/allfiles/mrbayes/input.fasta.fasta.mrb.run1.p" and "/opt/ADOPS1/revmuscle/S10/batch/allfiles/mrbayes/input.fasta.fasta.mrb.run2.p":
Summaries are based on a total of 3002 samples from 2 runs.
Each run produced 2001 samples of which 1501 samples were included.
Parameter summaries saved to file "/opt/ADOPS1/revmuscle/S10/batch/allfiles/mrbayes/input.fasta.fasta.mrb.pstat".

95% HPD Interval
--------------------
Parameter         Mean      Variance     Lower       Upper       Median    min ESS*  avg ESS    PSRF+
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TL{all}         1.471030    0.003284    1.365205    1.592360    1.469561   1257.88   1379.44    1.001
r(A<->C){all}   0.115330    0.000127    0.094336    0.137782    0.115189    948.28   1034.06    1.000
r(A<->G){all}   0.305625    0.000304    0.273833    0.340291    0.305149    725.27    770.12    1.000
r(A<->T){all}   0.072161    0.000049    0.059511    0.086575    0.071908   1072.54   1079.48    1.000
r(C<->G){all}   0.153613    0.000220    0.122973    0.180978    0.153229    979.98   1022.01    1.002
r(C<->T){all}   0.268540    0.000274    0.238470    0.302220    0.268326    692.23    776.93    1.001
r(G<->T){all}   0.084731    0.000077    0.068001    0.101918    0.084730    970.27    982.82    1.000
pi(A){all}      0.297933    0.000117    0.278158    0.319947    0.298072    818.86    894.36    1.000
pi(C){all}      0.170297    0.000068    0.154141    0.186600    0.170191    976.67   1035.62    1.000
pi(G){all}      0.187566    0.000075    0.170474    0.204133    0.187396    965.48    978.88    1.000
pi(T){all}      0.344204    0.000128    0.322955    0.366896    0.344177    877.40    907.52    1.000
alpha{1,2}      0.924174    0.017807    0.688301    1.195225    0.906571   1181.70   1237.15    1.000
alpha{3}        1.711391    0.146508    1.064725    2.488710    1.650764   1061.09   1281.04    1.000
pinvar{all}     0.036911    0.000857    0.000043    0.096179    0.030339   1256.00   1378.50    1.001
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Convergence diagnostic (ESS = Estimated Sample Size); min and avg values
correspond to minimal and average ESS among runs.
ESS value below 100 may indicate that the parameter is undersampled.
+ Convergence diagnostic (PSRF = Potential Scale Reduction Factor; Gelman
and Rubin, 1992) should approach 1.0 as runs converge.


Setting sumt conformat to Simple



 --- CODEML SUMMARY

Model 1: NearlyNeutral	-4803.007531
Model 2: PositiveSelection	-4769.267141
Model 0: one-ratio	-4927.143177
Model 3: discrete	-4768.761995
Model 7: beta	-4813.700505
Model 8: beta&w>1	-4770.729276


Model 0 vs 1	248.27129199999945

Model 2 vs 1	67.48077999999987

Additional information for M1 vs M2:
Naive Empirical Bayes (NEB) analysis
Positively selected sites (*: P>95%; **: P>99%)
(amino acids refer to 1st sequence: S10_SFBB1)

            Pr(w>1)     post mean +- SE for w

    10 N      0.973*        3.435
    16 R      0.999**       3.499
    20 P      0.999**       3.500
    49 L      0.997**       3.495
    54 F      0.830         3.078
    56 E      0.972*        3.431
    81 G      0.533         2.333
    93 Q      0.520         2.300
    97 R      0.890         3.226
   105 I      0.991**       3.481
   107 T      0.999**       3.499
   124 Q      0.630         2.576
   153 T      0.906         3.266
   168 E      0.800         3.001
   171 C      0.986*        3.468
   187 T      1.000**       3.502
   189 E      0.948         3.371

Bayes Empirical Bayes (BEB) analysis (Yang, Wong & Nielsen 2005. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:1107-1118)
Positively selected sites (*: P>95%; **: P>99%)
(amino acids refer to 1st sequence: S10_SFBB1)

            Pr(w>1)     post mean +- SE for w

    10 N      0.959*        3.521 +- 0.650
    16 R      0.999**       3.633 +- 0.415
    20 P      0.999**       3.634 +- 0.413
    49 L      0.996**       3.628 +- 0.431
    54 F      0.765         2.983 +- 1.144
    56 E      0.964*        3.543 +- 0.629
    97 R      0.847         3.215 +- 1.004
   105 I      0.989*        3.609 +- 0.484
   107 T      0.998**       3.633 +- 0.417
   124 Q      0.567         2.473 +- 1.318
   153 T      0.875         3.296 +- 0.943
   168 E      0.726         2.875 +- 1.190
   171 C      0.982*        3.590 +- 0.529
   187 T      1.000**       3.637 +- 0.403
   189 E      0.931         3.450 +- 0.771


Model 8 vs 7	85.94245799999953

Additional information for M7 vs M8:
Naive Empirical Bayes (NEB) analysis
Positively selected sites (*: P>95%; **: P>99%)
(amino acids refer to 1st sequence: S10_SFBB1)

            Pr(w>1)     post mean +- SE for w

    10 N      0.994**       2.956
    16 R      1.000**       2.968
    20 P      1.000**       2.968
    49 L      0.999**       2.967
    54 F      0.954*        2.873
    56 E      0.989*        2.946
    58 G      0.613         2.137
    68 L      0.558         2.024
    69 A      0.780         2.501
    81 G      0.780         2.499
    93 Q      0.739         2.406
    95 R      0.736         2.409
    96 S      0.636         2.181
    97 R      0.967*        2.899
   105 I      0.997**       2.962
   107 T      1.000**       2.968
   124 Q      0.806         2.550
   137 Y      0.555         2.007
   139 Y      0.601         2.124
   153 T      0.967*        2.900
   168 E      0.945         2.855
   171 C      0.995**       2.959
   187 T      1.000**       2.969
   189 E      0.982*        2.931
   217 K      0.707         2.344

Bayes Empirical Bayes (BEB) analysis (Yang, Wong & Nielsen 2005. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:1107-1118)
Positively selected sites (*: P>95%; **: P>99%)
(amino acids refer to 1st sequence: S10_SFBB1)

            Pr(w>1)     post mean +- SE for w

    10 N      0.995**       2.638 +- 0.385
    16 R      1.000**       2.648 +- 0.368
    20 P      1.000**       2.648 +- 0.368
    49 L      0.999**       2.647 +- 0.370
    54 F      0.963*        2.570 +- 0.476
    56 E      0.990**       2.630 +- 0.404
    58 G      0.732         2.110 +- 0.827
    68 L      0.712         2.066 +- 0.824
    69 A      0.846         2.332 +- 0.700
    81 G      0.841         2.326 +- 0.716
    93 Q      0.807         2.260 +- 0.770
    95 R      0.826         2.285 +- 0.710
    96 S      0.738         2.122 +- 0.835
    97 R      0.972*        2.592 +- 0.456
   105 I      0.997**       2.643 +- 0.379
   107 T      0.999**       2.648 +- 0.368
   124 Q      0.850         2.349 +- 0.721
   136 Q      0.503         1.670 +- 0.917
   137 Y      0.691         2.027 +- 0.858
   139 Y      0.749         2.139 +- 0.785
   153 T      0.972*        2.594 +- 0.459
   168 E      0.957*        2.556 +- 0.491
   171 C      0.996**       2.641 +- 0.384
   187 T      1.000**       2.649 +- 0.366
   189 E      0.984*        2.618 +- 0.422
   217 K      0.803         2.243 +- 0.748